POLICY MAKING - CCA - WACKENHUT - CSC - CORNELL - MTC - SODEXHO CAMPAIGN - FEDERAL BAILOUT - INTERNATIONAL

 

Utah: State may pay Cornell settlement

Agencies urged to 'be more careful' in contractor talks
 
                By Dennis Romboy
                Deseret News staff writer
 
                      State lawmakers have learned some hard lessons about keeping one's word.
                      Contracts, handshakes and verbal assurances proved expensive to taxpayers Wednesday
                as the the Utah Legislature forked out nearly $12 million to settle disputes that could have
                been avoided had things been written out so as House Speaker Marty Stephen said "it's clear
                what is meant and what is expected."
                      Legislators held their noses while giving up
                nearly $10 million to get out of what one House
                member called a "foolish, idiotic boondoggle."
                      And that wasn't the only bitter pill an incensed
                Legislature forced itself to swallow in a 10-hour
                special session Wednesday.
                      It ponied up another $1.57 million to settle a
                potential lawsuit with a company whom state
                corrections officials led to believe would get the
                contract to build a private prison in Grantsville.
                      Settling out of court, state leaders say, saved
                Utah potentially tens of million of dollars.
                      But Stephens said state government agencies
                need "be more careful" in how the deal with
                contractors. The spoken word isn't good enough.
                "That's what got us in trouble," he said.
                      Gov. Mike Leavitt convened the Legislature mainly to resolve a 30-year dispute over
                governance of Utah's applied technology centers, which was settled by creating the state's
                10th college — the Utah College of Applied Technology. But in the days before and even
                during the session, the list of proposed bills and resolutions swelled to 18.
                      All but one passed, including a controversial measure removing the state tax exemption
                on income from municipal bonds issued by non-Utah entities. Legislators approved two
                Olympics-related bills.
                      One reduces vehicle registration fees from more than $200 to $35.50 for cars
                automakers provide for sporting events. General Motors anticipates supplying 4,500
                vehicles to shuttle athletes, officials and dignitaries during the 2002 Winter Games.
                      The other exempts rental property owners from transient room tax if they let their units
                fewer than four times a year. Many residents intend to rent their homes or condos to
                Olympic visitors.
                      Lawyer bashing turned into legislators' favorite sport while deliberating a $9.95 million
                settlement offer to the Salt Lake law firm that represented Utah in the lawsuit against big
                tobacco companies.
                      Former Democratic attorney general Jan Graham retained Crockett, Bendinger,
                Peterson & Casey on a 25 percent contingency fee contract. Utah stands to get nearly $1
                billion over 25 years in the multistate settlement with cigarette makers, meaning the firm
                was entitled to $250 million.
                      An arbitration panel awarded Crockett, Bendinger $65 million but the firm filed a lien
                against the state for the contingency fee as well. Rather than go to court, Republican
                Attorney General Mark Shurtleff negotiated a settlement.
                      Attorney Steve Crockett called the deal "fair."
                      "We gave up a lot," he said. "But we always said we wanted to do something that was
                reasonable for both sides."
                      Legislators were appalled the firm would seek more than the $65 million despite only
                having filed two briefs and attended three hearings.
                      "They're going to get $10 million for a result they didn't bring about," said Rep. Scott
                Daniels, D—Salt Lake, who voted against the resolution as did most House Democrats. The
                Senate overwhelmingly approved it.
                      Republicans blamed Graham for what Rep. James Ferrin, R—Orem, described as a
                "foolish, idiotic boondoggle."
                      "Gadzooks, I wonder who was representing the interests of this state," he said.
                      Some lawmakers said the state should have taken its chances with a jury.
                      But lawmakers were reminded the state was bound by a contract. "In law, there is no
                greedy lawyer defense to a breach of contract claim," said Shurtleff, who said resolving the
                matter saved the state as much as $175 million. He sees it as "you can fill a cavity now rather
                than pay for a root canal later."
                      Settling with Cornell Corrections Corp. was no less painful for lawmakers who grudgingly
                coughed up $1.57 million to settle a dispute over the abandoned private prison project.
                      Though it never signed a contract, the state Department of Corrections gave Cornell
                written and verbal instructions to build a 500-bed minimum security facility outside
                Grantsville. VCBO Architects and Hogan Construction spent 14 months designing and doing
                site work.
                      The state scrapped the project last year when prison recidivism declined and Utah's
                crime rate dipped. Cornell demanded to be paid for the work and threatened to sue if it
                wasn't. Five months of negotiations ensued.
                      Sen. Ed Mayne, D—West Valley, said the state is setting a bad precedent, noting a
                contract was never signed or documented. Prison officials, he said, made some "terribly
                poor" management decisions.
                      "I think we owe them something," Mayne said. "But I'm telling you $1.5 million is too
                much."
                      Investors in municipal bonds bought outside Utah believe they will be paying too much
                on interest income once the state starts taxing it in 2003. The Legislature removed the
                long-standing exemption on out-of-state bonds.
                      "It's a new tax," complained Sandy resident Barrie McCullough, who said he has invested
                in muni bonds for 25 years. "Once we get a new tax, it never goes away."
                      Leavitt, under pressure from investors, vetoed a similar legislation in March after the
                regular legislative session, saying it didn't get enough debate. He said he will sign it this time.
                      Bill sponsor Rep. Greg Curtis, R—Sandy, said the exemption is needed to make
                Utah-issued bonds more competitive in the marketplace. Utah was one of only two states
                that don't tax its own bonds. "I don't want to subsidize tax exemptions" in other states, he
                said.
                      The new version included a reciprocity clause, however. States that don't tax Utah bonds
                won't have their bonds taxed.
 
                Contributing: Bob Bernick Jr.

 

Utah: State may pay Cornell settlement II

http://www.sltrib.com/06202001/utah/107206.htm
Inmate Housing Plan Sought
                                                              Wednesday, June
                                                              20, 2001
 
          Utah lawmakers should craft a long-term plan that outlines how much
      they will pay toward housing state prison inmates at county jails -- and
      how much county governments will have to pay, a legislative committee
      voted Tuesday.
          The vote by the Joint Executive Appropriations Committee could be a
      positive sign for county sheriffs across Utah who have complained about
      the cost of housing inmates at their jails. More than 20 Utah counties with
      jails will spend nearly $3.1 million to incarcerate inmates this year, with
      the state pitching in about $7.3 million.
          In the past, legislators have sometimes elected to subsidize some
      county jail costs and at other times have provided no funding at all.
          In an unrelated matter, legislators are scheduled to vote today on a
      $1.5 million settlement with the Cornell Corrections Corp. The deal
      stems from the Utah Department of Corrections' decision to cancel a
      privatized prison project with Cornell last year to run a 500-bed private
      prison near Grantsville. If the settlement is approved, the state would pay
      Cornell roughly $875,000 more, having already paid about $675,000.
          -- Frank Curreri

 

New Mexico: Cornell Trouble.

                              Albuquerque Journal

                            June 20, 2001
 
Youth Jail Security To Be Assessed

Jeremy Pawloski Journal Staff Writer 

   A security consultant will visit the Santa Fe County juvenile detention
center to assess Monday's escape by a 17-year-old, who climbed over a 20-foot,
barbed wire-topped fence, a jail official said Tuesday.

   Gary Miller, senior division director for Cornell Companies, said Tuesday
that the security consultant will determine whether the juvenile jail needs to
be made more secure, or whether Monday night's escape is an aberration.

   Houston-based Cornell Companies operates both the Santa Fe County juvenile
jail and the adult jail.

   Miller said the consultant, who is employed by Cornell, may visit as soon
as
next week. In the meantime, the recreation area at the juvenile jail known as
the "bullpen," from which Orlando Haws of Santa Fe escaped, is closed to
prisoners, Miller said.

   The area will remain closed until the consultant gives jail officials a
security assessment, he said.

   While much of the recreation area is lined by a fence made by a company
that
touts its product as "unclimbable" because it curves over the enclosed area,
Haws scaled a small section of a different type, Miller said.

   "This one section was not part of that newer fence that was put in," he
said.

   Miller added that it's still quite a feat that Miller was able to get over
the fence and then scale another, smaller fence outside and escape on foot.

   About 11 detainees, including Haws, and two jail staff members were
participating in a horticulture class in the courtyard when Haws escaped,
Miller
said.

   Haws was apprehended without incident about three hours after his 6:40 p.m.
escape, according to the Santa Fe County Sheriff's Department.

   At the time of his escape, Haws was in custody on a probation violation,
Santa Fe County Undersheriff Benjie Montano has said. Jail officials would not
say Tuesday what charge or charges led to Haws' probation.

   Haws was back in custody "under more intensive or close supervision"
Tuesday,
Miller said.

 

Cornell: Ex-Inmate Files Claim Alleging Rape in Jail 

Albuquerque Journal
May 12, 2001

Journal Staff Report 

The attorney for a Las Vegas, N.M., woman has filed a claim alleging the woman was raped by an employee of the privately run Santa Fe County jailwhile she was an inmate and that a former guard also tried to rape her.

The claim by Mary Lucinda Valdez, 23, follows a federal suit filed earlier this year by three women who were locked up at the jail claiming the former guard, Marcus Trujillo, sexually abused them. Another former inmate said this week she intends to sue the jail after guards forced her and other women locked up there to mix with male prisoners.

According to the claim filed for Valdez by Taos attorney Stephen M. Peterson, she was a federal prisoner at the jail from April 2000 through March 13, 2001.

The claim, filed earlier this month, names Santa Fe County, Texas-based Cornell Cos., which operates the jail under contract with the county, Trujillo, and the unidentified employee as potential defendants of a lawsuit.

Paul Doucette, Cornell's director of public affairs, declined comment on the claim on Friday but said Trujillo was fired from his job earlier this year, "several days after the incident." He was uncertain of the date.

He wouldn't comment further on Valdez's accusations, but said a criminal investigation found no wrongdoing.

Santa Fe County Undersheriff Benjie Montano said his department conducted that investigation with the U.S. Marshals Service, since Valdez was a federal prisoner. He referred questions to the Marshals Service, which couldn't be reached after business hours on Friday.

No telephone listing was found in the Santa Fe area for Trujillo.

According to the claim: During one incident, Trujillo walked into Valdez's cell, shoved her against a wall, and kissed and fondled her. She fought him off and reported the incident to an unnamed jail captain. On another occasion, another employee whose identity Valdez did not know coerced her to have sex with him in her cell. Though she did not attempt to fight him off, the claim says, the sex was not consensual. She did not report that incident.

"I think when you report it to somebody on the inside and nothing really happens and you're in a prison situation, it's pretty difficult to know who to talk to," said Peterson, who was uncertain of the dates of either incident.

The jail employee, though, later bragged he was having sex with Valdez and other female inmates, prompting another inmate to complain, the claim says.

Valdez was interviewed by Santa Fe County sheriff's detectives about the complaints, which lead to further harassment by another jail employee who was related to her alleged attacker, the claim says.

Valdez was then moved to a facility in Sandoval County by the U.S. Marshals Service, which her attorney said may lend credence to her claims. "I think that there was a concern on their part that the events may have occurred and they want to take reasonable precautions," Peterson said.

The claim says Valdez intends to sue for alleged negligence, assault, battery, infliction of emotional distress, sexual harassment and rape. Valdez was jailed in Santa Fe County on federal drug charges, Peterson said, and is now in a halfway house in Albuquerque. He was uncertain of the disposition of her case.

The federal suit, which has not gone to trial, was filed by attorneys for Angelique Romero, Tamara Martinez and Iris Gallegos and claimed Trujillo touched them inappropriately while they were inmates in June and July of 2000.

Attorneys for another former Santa Fe County inmate, Carmen Jaramillo, said this week they plan to file suit on her behalf alleging guards at the jail forced her and five other female inmates to mix with male prisoners in March.Doucette said Cornell has since relocated the jail's female prisoners to assure they remain separate from their male counterparts and now requires that guards for the female prisoners be women.

The jail averages about 630 prisoners, 100 of whom are women.

 

top


More on Federal bailout.
http://www.tennessean.com/business/archives/01/04/04731294.shtml?Element_ID=
Saturday, 05/05/01

                    CCA getting $520,000 more than
                    agreed to in contract

                    By GETAHN WARD
                    Staff Writer and Bloomberg News

                    Corrections Corporation of America said the Federal Bureau
                    of Prisons will award the company $520,000 above what it is due
                    under contracts to house inmates at two prisons.

                    The award is a result of the prison operatorís exceeding minimum
                    provisions of contracts to house federal inmates at its Eloy (Ariz.)
                    Detention Center and its California City (Calif.) Correctional
                    Center.

                    It follows a semi-annual performance review by the Bureau of
                    Prisons.

                    The Arizona prison will receive $285,000; the California prison
                    will receive $235,000, Nashville-based CCA said.

                    Its shares rose 7 cents to 71 cents.

                    Triad Hospitals Inc. of Dallas, which recently acquired
                    Brentwood-based Quorum Health Group Inc., said it has
                    completed the sale of two hospitals in Minot, N. D., to Trinity
                    Health.

                    The sold hospitals ó UniMed Medical Center and Kenmare
                    Community Hospital ó were inherited through Triadís purchase
                    of Quorum.

                    Buyer Trinity Health is a nonprofit hospital company in Minot.

                    Triad said it expects proceeds of $46 million.

                    Shares of the owner and manager of hospitals and ambulatory
                    surgery centers yesterday rose 21 cents to $29.70.

 

California: Prisons as economic development?
http://www.fresnobee.com/voicescol1/story/0,1870,275773,00.html
Prison can't secure city's
               salvation
 
                              By Erin Kennedy
                               The Fresno Bee
 
               (Published June 19, 2001)
 
               It's not likely Orange Cove will get the federal prison that
               it's competing against Mendota for, but that won't stop
               Mayor Victor Lopez. He's courting private prison builders
               just in case.
 
               Lopez is convinced that a prison would mean salvation for
               one of California's poorest cities, bringing high-paying jobs,
               more tax dollars and spin-off development.
 
               Many of the would-be prison's neighbors are equally
               convinced it will be the city's ruination, draining water from
               its lifeblood industry, agriculture, putting more high-speed
               commuters on two-lane roads and scaring off potential
               development with higher crime.
 
               At last week's emotional public hearing on the issue, the
               two sides faced off -- the mostly Anglo, established
               farmers and business owners against the Hispanic, new
               immigrant laborers and blue-collar workers who want
               permanent, full-time jobs.
 
               Ironically neither side's predictions are likely to be fulfilled.
               According to the few experts who have studied how
               prisons affect small towns, prisons rarely bring economic
               boom or more crime and crowding.
 
               Orange Cove's leaders would do well to look to places
               such as Avenal, Delano or Corcoran that still are struggling
               with soaring unemployment despite the prisons they host.
               The San Joaquin Valley, with its plethora of struggling rural
               towns, has become a prison mecca with no real measurable
               benefits.
 
               A 1990 state study of Avenal found that there was little
               financial boost from the state lockup because prison
               employees were willing to commute long distances rather
               than relocate to a city they deemed too small, isolated and
               without amenities. Avenal's 16% unemployment rate is the
               same as before the prison was built.
 
               Orange Cove might find itself in the same position.
 
               Mayor Lopez insists his town will be different because he'll
               make sure residents are trained and ready for prison guard
               jobs. He points to how the town took 27 perpetual welfare
               mothers and turned them into certified day-care workers
               for the town's new child-care center: "If I can do that, sure
               as heck I can get some security guards ready."
 
               Cathy Ramirez says there already are people ready for
               those jobs. The college-educated Ramirez commutes 45
               minutes because she can't get a job in her hometown. She
               has three college friends just like her who don't have the
               money to relocate for work and have resorted to picking
               peaches here.
 
               "It's frustrating," Ramirez says. "It's time to let the city
               grow."
 
               Orange Cove certainly needs something. Unemployment is
               34%, and 69% of residents get some type of welfare. With
               a per capita income of $4,300, it ranks as California's
               poorest city. Any time there's a big freeze, it gets worse.
 
               Manuel Ferreira, the city parks director, doesn't necessarily
               want a prison, but he doesn't see any better options: "We
               desperately need diversification. We need something
               besides oranges ... We're going to dry up and blow away
               as a town otherwise."
 
               He's right.
 
               Too bad Orange Cove's opposing factions can't work
               together to bring in something with real, demonstrated
               benefits -- like maybe a call center or a food-processing
               plant.

 

 

top


ARAMARK Agrees to Quit Private Prison Trade Association
Student Activists Credits Recent Victory Over Competitor Sodexho


New York, NY. The nation’s second largest catering company, ARAMARK, has announced plans to withdraw from the Association of Private Correctional and Treatment Organizations (APCTO) after receiving complaints from students opposed to prison privatization.

The company’s decision was made public by ARAMARK CEO Joseph Neubauer in a June 12, 2001 letter to Not With Our Money!a student group which led a successful campaign against ARAMARK’s main competitor, Sodexho Marriott Services, over Sodexho’s ties to private prisons.  Neubauer writes:

“Thank you for bringing to my attention the letter concerning  ARAMARK’s apparent involvement with APCTO.  I was not personally aware of this matter since it had not been properly reviewed by the appropriate corporate people.  I have also been informed that we had not made any written or financial commitment to APCTO although one of our people did attend some preliminary meetings.  As you can see from the attached letter, we have discontinued any further involvement with APCTO.”
In a press release announcing APCTO’s founding, the organization is described as an “industry trade association representing the interests of private correctional and treatment providers, other service and product providers, government officials and individuals interested in private corrections and treatment.”  But NWOM! responds that the group, which is headed by Cornell Corrections’ CEO Steve Logan, is nothing more than a front for the private prison industry.

The press release, dated May 7, 2001, also lists ARAMARK as a founding member and quotes ARAMARK Vice-President Dan Jameson.  “We see the fine work being done and we are pleased to be able to participate in the formation of this organization,".

Representatives of Not With Our Money! hailed the company’s change of heart as a sign of changing corporate attitudes toward prison privatization and toward student protesters.  “ARAMARK has definitely taken a more enlightened approach,” says Pari Zutshi, a junior at Hampshire College.  “We had to fight Sodexho Marriott for more than a year to get their parent company to divest from Corrections Corporation of America, and it will probably take another year before they give up on their private prisons overseas.  ARAMARK met our demand in less than a week.”

Students affiliated with the Not With Our Money! campaign against prison profiteering have targeted Paris-based multinational caterer Sodexho Alliance, which until recently owned  6.5% of CCA’s stock, by denying lucrative dining service contracts to Sodexho’s North American subsidiary, Sodexho Marriott Services.  During the last 14 months, the campaign has spread to more than 50 colleges and universities, leading to dozens of protestsincluding four building occupationsand seven lost contracts. 

On May 22, 2001, CCA’s CEO, John Ferguson, announced at the private prison company’s annual shareholder meeting that Sodexho Alliance had chosen to divest as a result student pressure.   Sodexho Alliance continues to operate private prisons through subsidiaries in the U.K. and Australia. 

Background Information:

Not With Our Money! is a coalition of students, youth and educators working to end the use of incarcerated human beings for corporate profit.  We believe that for-profit private prisons have no place in a democratic society.  Profiteering from the imprisonment of human beings compromises public safety and corrupts justice.  In the spirit of democracy and accountability, we call for an end to all private prisons.  Organizations involved in the Not With Our Money! campaign include the Black Radical Congress, Prison Moratorium Project, Students for a Sensible Drug Policy United Students Against Sweatshops, the U.S. Student Association and Young Democratic Socialists.

ARAMARK describes itself as a $7.3 billion world leader in providing managed servicesfood and support services, uniform and career apparel, and childcare and early education programs. Headquartered in Philadelphia, ARAMARK has over 170,000 employees serving 15 million people at 500,000 locations in 15 countries every day. Additional information on the company is available at http://www.aramark.com.

 

Sodexho-Marriott: Piece on protests


http://news.excite.com/news/uw/010504/politics-220
Colleges across U.S. protest Sodexho Marriott

By Jenn West
  Temple News
  Temple U.

  (U-WIRE) PHILADELPHIA -- Students across the country have been boycotting
  Sodexho Marriott Services, the catering company contracted by Temple University and
  other schools across the nation to provide dining services to their students.

  The protests are part of a student-led campaign called "Not with our Money!" which is
  part of the larger Prison Moratorium Project. Students are protesting the growing
  involvement of the French multinational company Sodexho Alliance in the global private
  prison industry.

  Students at various schools have staged protests, which range from sit-ins to outdoor
  picnic boycotts against corporations that finance the expansion of prisons-for-profit.
  Sodexho protests have taken place on more than 50 of the 500 campuses where the
  company operates dining halls and food courts.

  Kevin Pranis, a Board member and coordinator for the Prison Moratorium Project,
  said that the actual protests against Sodexho started over a year ago with 10 schools
  protesting, in some form, on April 4. Of those 10 original schools, four now use dining
  services other than Sodexho. In more recent events, protests at a number of schools
  have increased the number of victories. Some schools have broken their contracts with
  Sodexho early and others have called off talks with the company.

  "Clearly, the company has been forced to respond," Pranis said. He added that
  Sodexho has said it will sell its shares in the CCA, but that has yet to happen.

  The project originally targeted just the New York area, but that quickly enlarged to
  much of the United States and most recently to London and Paris.

  The PMP exists still as a resource for interested college and university organizations.
  Pranis said that at the current time, actually going out and setting up events at campus is
  difficult and nearly all the recent organizations that have pledged support to the protests
  have been the one to contact the project.

  These organizations are a wide variety, ranging from student governments to sweatshop
  activists and even culturally oriented groups.

  Sodexho is one of the world's largest private prison catering services. It is also the
  largest shareholder in the Corrections Corporation of America, which runs for-profit
  private prisons in which numerous human rights violations against inmates and guards
  allegedly occur.

  If these private prisons can make housing inmates cheaper than what the federal
  government pays, then the prison can pocket the profit, which proves to be appealing
  to Sodexho who has shares in the CCA.

  In order to conserve money, the CCA has reportedly resorted to such tactic as,
  supplying inmates with only one blanket, no toilet paper, withholding pre-natal care for
  pregnant inmates and in worst cases depriving ill inmates of proper medical attention.

  For-profit prisons operate by charging the federal government money for the housing of
  each prisoner in the private prison.

  Through grant money, the "Not With Our Money" campaign has expanded to numerous
  campuses and is working to discontinue Sodexho contracts across the country. They
  believe that profiteering from the imprisonment of people compromises public safety
  and is a corruption of justice.

  Students across America, not excluding Temple students, purchase Sodexho Marriott
  meal plans, thereby supporting the Sodexho Alliance and its private for-profit prisons,
  according to the protest group. Across the country students have promoted change in
  discontinuing their Sodexho Marriott contract due to their CCA affiliation.

  Sodexho Marriott Services generates $1.2 billion in annual revenues not only from
  college campuses, but also provides institutional food services to public schools,
  hospitals and corporate cafeterias.

 

Ohio: Xavier students continue protests.

As Sleep-out continues on past the two day mark, local radio station
invites college activists into studio.  Nate Livingston interviewed
freshman at Xavier, Brian Loewe, on his afternoon talk radio show.

Audio of the interview available in mp3 format at
http://www.geocities.com/bsplat

Students have now reached the 59 hour mark in their "Caged-In,
Sleep-Out, Speak-Out" outside of their president's office.  "As finals
week is coming up, many of us are worried about our exams.  But Jesuits
teach that justice cannot be secondary, it must be at the core of the
university.  We are taking this to heart and making justice on campus
our primary concern.  Our president said he would have a statement
prepared this week, hopefully he'll have it tomorrow so that our grades
won't suffer due to our work towards justice."

 

Texas: UT discusses Sodexho-Merriott.

http://news.excite.com/news/uw/010423/university-193
U. Texas students, officials discuss Sodexho contract
Updated 12:00 PM ET April 23, 2001

By Celina Moreno
Daily Texan
U. Texas-Austin

(U-WIRE) AUSTIN, Texas -- Three students met with University of Texas-Austin President Larry Faulkner and other UT officials Friday to express theirobjections to a possible renewal of a food concessions contract with Sodexho-Marriot Inc., whose parent company, Sodexho Alliance, holds stock in a for-profit private prison company.

Students opposed the contract, arguing that the University's connection with Sodexho Alliance and its stock in the Corrections Corporation of America is "bad public policy."

Sodexho Alliance owns 8 percent of stock in CCA, which has been accused of numerous human rights violations, said Kevin Pranis, a board member for the Prison Moratorium Project, an information resource group based in New York City.

Pranis added that despite promises made by Sodexho Alliance to divest its shares in the private prison industry, it has increased its investments by purchasing 100 percent ownership in the United Kingdom Detention Services and the Corrections Corporation of Australia.

Bob Libal, a communication studies and government sophomore who attended the meeting, said the false promises made by Sodexho were meant to respond to student protests around the country.

"Despite what Sodexho Alliance says, they've made no efforts to divest any of their shares in CCA and instead have, since their original announcement,obtained full ownership of two prison agencies," Libal said. "That would indicate that they're trying to appease student protesters across the country when, in actuality, furthering their involvement with CCA and the for-profit prison industry."

Steven Owen, director of marketing for CCA, said Thursday that allegations of human rights abuses are false.

"That is absolutely not true," Owen said. "Oftentimes we are held to higher standards than our govermental counterparts, and we must meet all state laws and

federal laws."

Aaron Garza, president of the Undergraduate Student Association and a communication studies sophomore, said administrators should seriously consider concerns of student protesters and Student Government, who recently passed a resolution opposing the renewal of the Sodexho-Marriot contract.

"The students have made a mandate end the contract with Sodexho-Marriot," Garza said. "And because students comprise this University, the student interest should be the University's interest."

Faulkner said when a company's integrity is being questioned, the allegations against the company should be accurate.

"If the behaviors demonstrated [by CCA prisons] are egregious, then certainly we need to look at them," Faulkner said. "But the University also believes in not convicting people on hearsay."

Libal said students provided Faulkner with a 30-page packet at the meeting that documents student opposition to the contract and cites human rights abusesthat have been documented by several human rights organizations.

"Students have done a really good job at researching the misdoings of CCA, and the administration need not look much further than looking at condemnations by Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch and by several state governors who already threatened to or already ended contracts because of numerous human rights violations and because of CCA's reluctance to allow investigations by state agencies," Libal said.

The decision to contract with a bidder will be made by the middle of May, said Faulkner, who added that the University is not equipped to carry out a criminal investigation of CCA's prisons and should not make a decision to renew the food contract with Sodexho-Marriot before all bids are received.

Section 1.2 of the Request For Proposal, which is sent to the contract bidders, states "Professional entertainment and other events (including, but not limited to, banquets, trade show and clinics) will be included in the scope of responsibility."

Garza said because catering events will be contracted to the concessionaire, even a complete student boycott of Sodexho-Marriot food products would be ineffective. He added that since the contract will last for seven years, student opinion is of the utmost importance.

"It means that the opinions of SG and the student body are irrelevant in the face of profit," Garza said. "For seven more years, we'd be funding torture and slavery that even a full student boycott could not prevent, because whoever gets that contract gets that money whether the students eat the food or not."

New Mexico: Halfway house raises concerns.
http://www.abqjournal.com/news/316181news04-25-01.htm
Wednesday, April 25, 2001


top


 

Observers consider prison company one of best in industry

THE BEACON JOURNAL

Posted at 3:58 p.m. EDT Thursday, April 26, 2001

BY LIZ SIDOTI

Associated Press Writer

COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) -- The company poised to take over operation of a prison in northeast Ohio has few blemishes in its past and recently scored high marks for its management of Ohio's only other privately run state prison. Management & Training Corp., of Ogden, Utah, will run the North Coast Correctional Treatment Facility, a 552-bed minimum-security prison in Grafton, when the current operator's contract ends June 30.

The state didn't renew its $14.8 million contract with CiviGenics Corp., of Marlboro, Mass., because of increasing problems at the prison. The prison had five different wardens in its first 18 months, and the state said CiviGenics did not meet minimum staffing levels. The state did not immediately release the amount of MTC's contract. MTC came under similar scrutiny at least once since getting into the prison industry in 1987. In 1995, the Arizona Department of Corrections released a scathing report charging that that state's first privately run prison, the MTC-run Marana Community Correctional Treatment Facility, was plagued by staffing problems.

The report was highly critical of MTC's salaries for corrections officers, saying the prison was crippled by an employee turnover rate exceeding 80 percent. The report said the company paid 18 percent less than what state paid.

Ron Russell, MTC's senior vice president for corrections, recently called the Arizona report an attempt by a small group of officials there to try to discredit private prisons.

He said no one contacted MTC when compiling the report, which covered the company's first year of operating the prison. Industry observers say both private companies and public agencies normally hit many kinks during the first year of running a new facility. ``There's kind of a shakedown period,'' said Charles W. Thomas, former director of the Private Corrections Project at the Center for Studies in Criminology and Law at the University of Florida.

But if MTC had a difficult first year operating Ohio's Lake Erie Correctional Institution in Conneaut, it didn't show in audits done by the state and the American Corrections Association nine months after the prison opened in April 2000.

According to the audits, MTC met 90.5 percent of state standards, 100 percent of mandatory standards and 98.1 percent of non-mandatory standards set by ACA for certification for the 1,380-bed medium-security prison. The company and observers attribute MTC's success in the industry to its history of being a privately held company focused on education. MTC's roots date to 1966 when it was the education division of Thiokol Corp. and first contracted with the federal government to operate Job Corps centers. Job Corps provides at-risk youth with vocational, academic, and social skills training. The company continues to operate 24 centers nationwide.

``They're using some of the skills and management abilities they gleaned from running their job centers as a springboard into a more thought-out plan for running prisons,'' said Frank Mylar, who has represented the Utah State Department of Corrections as an assistant attorney general and has been an adjunct professor of corrections law at the University of Utah.

MTC, unlike most other private prison companies, seems to have a commitment to training inmates -- and not simply warehousing them -- so they can make a smooth transition to freedom after incarceration, Mylar said. He called MTC's move into the prisons business from the education field ``a natural link for them.''

Thomas credits MTC's success to it being a privately held rather than a publicly traded company, freeing it from pressure by shareholders. ``One of the benefits is that they don't have to have the Wall Street analysts birddogging them every single business quarter,'' he said. Because the company isn't publicly traded, Russell said, officials are able to focus on a management plan that bolsters MTC's reputation first and its pocketbook second.

``If we do a job that we're supposed to do, profit comes later,'' Russell said. ``The better we can apply education, the better we can reduce recidivism. And that's our goal.''

 

top


 

Australia: Wackenhut doing full-body cavity searches

http://www.abc.net.au/news/state/vic/archive/metvic-15may2001-10.htm

                    Prison operators reject claims of body searches

Victorian prison managers have rejected claims that inmates are being subjected to illegal daily body searches.

The claims were made by prisoners at the privately run Port Phillip and Fulham jails.

John Myers, the general manager of Australasian Correctional Management, which also runs the Fulham prison at Sale, says the allegation about cavity searches is wrong.

"Searching is an important aspect of any prison operation."

"It stops the introduction of illegal substances, drugs, weapons and things like that, so it's important to keep that stuff out of the prison."

" We just don't do those sorts of cavity searches. Its just not on," Mr Myers said.

A spokesman for Corrections Minister, Andre Haermeyer, says no formal complaint has been made to the department about illegal searches.

 

 

Venezuela: Troubles in prisons to lead to for-profits

http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/nm/20010501/wl/venezuela_prison_dc_1.html

Tuesday May 1 5:05 PM ET

Venezuelan Prison Battle Kills Six, Injures Eight

CARACAS, Venezuela (Reuters) - Six Venezuelan prisoners were killed and eight were injured on Tuesday in a clash between rival gangs of armed inmates at one of the country's most notorious prisons, a senior security officer said.

National Guard Gen. Rafael Dubron told a local television station that units of the Guard entered El Tocuyito prison, southwest of Caracas, to halt the fighting and restore order.

``The situation is now completely under control,'' he said.

Earlier, Globovision television had reported a fierce gunbattle at the prison, which broke out after a gang of inmates from one section stormed a wing controlled by a rival group.

Dubron did not give details of what weapons the prisoners used but he said a homemade grenade or bomb had exploded during the fighting at El Tocuyito, which has a reputation for being one of the most violent of Venezuela's 30 prisons.

Deaths and injuries, often the result of clashes between feuding gangs, are an almost daily occurrence among the 16,300 convicts in this oil-rich South American nation.

Pistols, knives and other weapons, drugs, and even mobile phones are frequently smuggled into Venezuela's prisons by visitors, officials say. Two prisoners were killed on Friday in separate fights in the Yare facility, west of Caracas.

President Hugo Chavez's government has announced a plan to modernize prisons and is studying the possibility of allowing foreign private companies to build and run new ones.

 

top